On Monday, February 22, the popular navigation app Waze and owner Google were sued in Delaware federal court by the Israeli-based Makor Issues and Rights Limited. This software company sued Waze and Google on grounds that Waze and Google are infringing two patents it owns.
Makor argued in the patent suit
that Waze and Google are directly using technology in Google Maps and the Waze
App that are included in patents the Israeli company has owned since the early
2000s. These patents are concerned with traffic monitoring technology that
enables drivers to avoid traffic jams. If you have ever used the Waze app
before, this is one of the key features of the app – Waze users can update
traffic information in their location to help other users of the app avoid
certain routes and traffic.
The two specific patents
mentioned in Makor’s suit are U.S. #6,480,783 and U.S. #6,615,130 (the “783”
and “130” patents). The “783” patent is titled “Real time vehicle guidance and
forecasting system under traffic jam conditions,” and the “130” patent is
titled “Real time vehicle guidance and traffic forecasting system.”
In the lawsuit, Makor points out
that the company has owned these patents since the early 2000s and that Waze
and Google “knew or should have known” of the valid ‘783 and ‘130 patents.
Their hoped outcome includes an unspecified amount of damages, payment of
attorney’s fees, and a judgment that Google and Waze have infringed Makor’s
intellectual property.
In contrast to the Apple-VirnetX
patent suit where VirnetX does not actually develop any technology, Makor was
the actual company that created this intellectual property and filed the
patent. It will be interesting to see how Google and Waze respond to this
lawsuit. Google is certainly familiar with patent suits, as it is currently
involved in a number of litigation suits.
Hi Jay,
ReplyDeleteI also looked at this case for the week and I liked how you included the distinction that Makor is different from VirnetX in that they are not simply patent trolls. I wonder if this will play out differently in court due to this difference. Your blog was informative and easy to read thanks for the post!